Today I was asked what is wrong with distance learning? At first I was going to talk about a host of issues from whether the cost savings are worth the pay-off, to whether distance learning, or learning that focuses on technology was really just a way for technology companies to make money off what should be a public endeavor, to wondering whether much learning actually takes place.
But then I realized that I was responding to an unspoken assumption--that education is broken and needs to be fixed, and technology is just the thing to fix it.
Again.
Granted, technology can be a wonderful thing. I use my Smartboard or Elmo (those newfangled things that work like overhead projectors but read anything, not just transparency sheets). Youtube videos help students get interested in a topic and can sometimes provide some additional information. And it's great when students can get their hands on laptops and use them to create something. But is the technology needed? Students can read books and write on paper. It accomplishes much the same task, albeit at a slower pace.
I can hear the argument already--we need to move quickly in our fast-paced 21st century. But do we? Or is there another underlying, unspoken assumption--that learning has to be fast-paced, that there is some race that if we don't run, we will get left behind. Really? And are kids little computers that if we program them with x or y they will automatically remember it? No, learning takes time and repetition if we want it to be truly meaningful. And learning is a social act--it needs other people.
About 15 years ago I read a book called
The End of Education by Neil Postman. In it he argued not that education was ending, but that we were ignoring the end, or purpose, of education. If the end of education is to produce adults that can enter the work force, well then by all means, let's go with on-line education. Stick every kid in front of a computer and have them sit there and get their assignments and complete them and then move on to the next concept. Some low-paid adult can walk around and monitor them to ensure they stay on-task.
But if the end of education is to create a well-rounded individual who understands history and art and social responsibility and has marketable skills, then let's place technology where it belongs--as a tool at the disposal of a teacher.
So, let's examine our unspoken assumptions. Maybe then we will ask, "What's right about distance learning?"